Belarus wants to divide "Union State" property?
Representatives of Russia and Belarus in the Parliamentary Assembly are worried by arguments around the "union" property.
As it was stated by the Deputy Chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union of Belarus and Russia Siarhej Maskevich, according to the data provided by BELTA, the "union state" needed to create effective normative legal base.
According to him, it is necessary to keep a record of the newly created objects in the "union state".
"Ejednevnik" reminds, that the issue of the union property has been first mentioned by the parlieamentaries of the "union state" in Autumn 2006. Then they said the corresponding legal base would be created. However, this issue has not been regulated for 4 years.
As it was stated by the Deputy Chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union of Belarus and Russia Siarhej Maskevich, according to the data provided by BELTA, the "union state" needed to create effective normative legal base.
According to him, it is necessary to keep a record of the newly created objects in the "union state".
"Ejednevnik" reminds, that the issue of the union property has been first mentioned by the parlieamentaries of the "union state" in Autumn 2006. Then they said the corresponding legal base would be created. However, this issue has not been regulated for 4 years.
